YALE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS
ARE FOREIGN AND PUBLIC CAPITAL PRODUCTIVE Miguel D. Ramirez May 2008 Abstract....Using panel data, this paper tests whether foreign, public,
and private capital have a positive and significant effect on aggregate output and labor
productivity for Mexico during the 1960-2001 period. The richer information set made
possible by the sectorial data enables this study to utilize the methodologically sound
"group-mean" Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) procedure developed
by Pedroni to generate consistent estimates of the relevant panel variables in the
cointegrated production (labor productivity) function. The results suggest that, in the
long run, changes in the stocks of public and private capital and the economically active
population (EAP) have a positive and economically significant effect on output (and labor
productivity) in all sectors. By contrast, changes in the stocks of foreign capital have a
mixed effect, with a negative and statistically significant effect on output (and labor
productivity) in the services sector; a positive and economically significant impact on
output (labor productivity) in the industrial sector, and a positive but insignificant
effect on output (labor productivity) in the primary sector. The period is also broken
down into two sub-periods: 1960-81 (state-led industrialization) and 1982-2001
("neoliberal" model). The estimate for the public capital variable clearly shows
that it had a positive and relatively important economic effect during the earlier
state-led period, while the private capital variable remains positive and significant in
both periods. The foreign capital variable has a positive and highly significant effect
during the ISI period, but, turns unexpectedly negative and economically significant in
the neoliberal period |