| GARTH FRAZER |
- Home Address:
521 Prospect Street, Apt. 1
New Haven, CT 06511-2129
Tel: (203) 782-9326
|
Office Address:
Department of Economics
Box 208268
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520-8268
Fax: (203) 432-5779
Birth Date: December 14, 1968
Citizenship: Canadian |
|
| Fields of
Concentration |
- Economic Development
Industrial Organization
Labor Economics
Applied Econometrics
|
| Desired Teaching: |
- Economic Development
Microeconomics
Labor Economics
Industrial Organization
International Trade
Environmental Economics
|
| Comprehensive
Examinations Completed: |
- May 1999 (Orals) Economic Development and Economics of the Public Sector and the
Environment
May 1998 (Written) Microeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Theory
|
| Dissertation Title: |
- Firms, Workers and Human Capital in Ghanaian Manufacturing
|
| Committee: |
- Professor Christopher Udry
Professor Steven Berry
Professor Patrick Bayer
|
| Expected Completion
Date: |
- May 2001
|
| Degrees: |
- M.Phil., Yale University, May 2000
M.A., Yale University, May 1999
M.A., University of Toronto, June 1994
B.Ed., University of Western Ontario, June 1992
B.Math (Honours, Co-op) University of Waterloo, May 1992, Dean's Honour List
|
| Fellowships, Honors
and Awards: |
- Yale University
MacArthur Network on Inequality and Economic Performance Graduate Fellowship, 2001-02
John F. Enders Fellowship, 2001
Ryoichi Sasakawa Fellowship, 1999-2000
Yale University Graduate Fellowship, 1997-2001
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Doctoral Fellowship 1997-2001
University of Toronto
University of Toronto Open Fellowship, 1993-94
University of Waterloo
W.I. Miller Scholarship, 1991-92
William Gartrell Memorial Scholarship, 1989-90
Trent University (1987-88)
Champlain Scholarship, 1987-88
Prizes for highest marks in first-year algebra, calculus, economics, psychology,
development
|
| Teaching Experience: |
- Teaching Assistant, Department of Economics, Yale University
European Economic History, Spring 2001
Introductory Microeconomics, Fall 2000
Teaching Assistant, Department of Economics, University of Toronto
Principles of Economics, 1993-94
Secondary School Mathematics Teacher (Fully Qualified)
Taught virtually all high school mathematics courses at schools in Cambridge and Toronto,
Ontario
Received the W.I. Miller Scholarship for "promise of leadership in the mathematics
teaching profession"
|
| Research Experience: |
- Research Assistant, Professor Gerald K. Helleiner, University of Toronto, 1996-97, on
the project, "Growth, External Sector and the Role of Non-Traditional Exports in
Sub-Saharan Africa"
Research Assistant, Professors Albert Berry, Susan Horton, and Dipak Mazumdar, University
of Toronto, 1994-95, on the project, "Globalization, Adjustment, Inequality and
Poverty"
|
| Papers: |
- "Linking Firms and Workers: Heterogeneous Labor and Returns to Education,"
September 2001. [Job Market Paper]
"The Firm and the Family Network: Measuring the Relative Productivity of
Relatives," September 2001.
"Formal versus Informal Training for the Manufacturing Sector: An Examination of
Apprenticeship in Ghana," in progress.
"Income Distribution and Development: A Parametric and Semiparametric Inquiry into
Kuznets' Curve," June 1999.
|
| References: |
- Professor Christopher Udry, Director
Economic Growth Center
Department of Economics
Yale University
Box 208269
New Haven, CT 06520-8269
Tel: (203) 432-3637
Fax: (203) 432-3635
E-mail: udry@yale.edu
Professor Patrick Bayer
Department of Economics
Yale University
Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Tel: (203) 432-6292
Fax: (203) 432-6323
E-mail: patrick.bayer@yale.edu
|
- Professor Steven Berry
Department of Economics
Yale University
Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Tel: (203) 432-3556
Fax: (203) 432-6323
E-mail: steven.berry@yale.edu
|
|
| Dissertation
Abstract: |
- A central question in development economics concerns how to encourage growth within the
manufacturing sector. This question is particularly important for many African nations
considering their relatively undeveloped manufacturing sectors. Given the importance of
human capital in many recent models of growth, this dissertation attempts to understand
the role of human capital in manufacturing productivity in Africa. The first paper begins
the inquiry by measuring the productive and wage returns to education in the manufacturing
sector, while developing a new method to handle ability bias in the wage equation.
Accurate measurement of returns to education is particularly important in a country where
government resources are extremely limited, and education's competition for budget dollars
is intense. The second paper reflects the context of Ghanaian manufacturing, where on
average sixteen percent of employees are related to the firm owner. It measures whether
these related employees are a burden to the manufacturing firm, as is sometimes suggested,
by comparing the productivity and remuneration of these related employees to their
non-related counterparts. The final paper seeks to determine what methods of education or
training best serve the needs of the Ghanaian manufacturing sector, by comparing the
productivity and remunerative benefits and costs of informal apprenticeship and formal
education in Ghana. In order to examine these questions, I use a panel dataset with
detailed information about Ghanaian manufacturing firms, and the employees at these firms.
This data comes from a survey organized by Oxford University and the Ghana Statistical
Service, and I participated throughout the most recent round of interviewing for this
survey in the Fall of 2000.
The first paper addresses the problem of ability bias in the measurement of returns to
education. The vast majority of papers which have attempted to measure returns to
education in the past twenty-five years have used a wage regression based on Mincer's
human capital earnings function (1974). The chief problem which these studies have
attempted to address is that of ability bias. A worker's ability is typically part of the
residual, and yet is correlated with an individual's schooling, resulting in biased
parameter estimates. This study takes a new perspective, by using information from the
firms where these workers work. It begins by specifying a production function that is
consistent with the Mincerian wage equation. The production function is estimated
consistently, taking into account the simultaneity of labor demand and output decisions
(Olley and Pakes, 1996; Levinsohn and Petrin, 2000). A result of including worker
schooling, experience and ability in the production function specification is that a
measure of worker ability, defined as the worker's contribution to firm product after
controlling for schooling and experience, is acquired. This measure of ability is exactly
that which the firm cares about, and therefore that which should be remunerated by the
firm. The ability measure can be used in a wage equation in order to control directly for
worker ability to obtain a consistent estimate of the returns to schooling. The model is
estimated using data from the manufacturing sector in Ghana, but is replicable to other
countries and datasets, given the recent increase in available linked employer-employee
datasets.
The second paper examines whether employees who are related to the firm owner are more or
less productive than non-relatives. In developing countries in general, and in Africa in
particular, the extended family is an important institution, often serving as a locus of
risk-sharing and redistribution. Manufacturing firm owners are typically among the
wealthier members within an extended family and therefore are sometimes forced to share
their profits with their extended family instead of re-investing in the business.
Moreover, firm owners have felt pressure to give jobs to relatives as part of the
obligation to the extended family. This paper tests whether this employment of relatives
is in fact a burden in the case of manufacturing firms in Ghana. Specifically, it tests
whether employees who are related to the firm owner receive a higher wage, conditional on
other factors, and are more productive, conditional on other factors, than non-relatives
of the firm owner. It then compares their relative productivity to their relative
remuneration. Testing this hypothesis requires careful estimation of both a production
function and a wage equation for the firm, and the format for the production function and
wage equation follow from the first paper. A term for heterogeneous labor in the firm
production function arises out of the implications of the wage equations of the Mincer
model.
The third paper, in progress, is an examination of appropriate education and training for
the manufacturing sector in Ghana. Other than formal education, apprenticeships are the
major form of training within the Ghanaian manufacturing sector. A substantial fraction of
firms, particularly smaller firms, train apprentices in the trade in which the firm is
engaged, such as carpentry, metal-working, or tailoring. These apprentices are paid very
low (or no) wages, and typically pay fees at the beginning and end of the apprenticeship,
which often lasts three years. In the dataset of Ghanaian manufacturing firms forming the
basis of this study, information is collected for a sub-sample of apprentices, as well as
the non-apprentice workers at the firm, including whether the workers ever completed an
apprenticeship at this or another firm. Using the information about the apprentices,
workers, and the firm itself, the productive and wage returns to the training of the
apprenticeship can be calculated and compared. These returns can also be compared to the
(productive and wage) returns to schooling within the manufacturing sector in order to
understand the type of training which is found most valuable by firms--the formal training
of schooling, or the informal training of apprenticeships. An important part of this story
will involve examining the degree to which firms fund apprenticeships. This can be
calculated because information on the timing and amount of payments to and from the
apprentices and the firm is known. Given that apprenticeships involve no government
expenditure, while schooling does, understanding the effectiveness of apprenticeship
versus schooling is important for crafting appropriate education and training policy in
Ghana.
|