| JENNIFER MURDOCK |
- Home Address:
|
Office Address:
Department of Economics
Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Tel: (203) 432-3577
Fax: (203) 432-6323 |
|
| Fields of
Concentration |
- Environmental Economics
Industrial Organization
Applied Econometrics
|
| Desired Teaching: |
- Industrial Organization
Environmental Economics
Applied Econometrics
Microeconomic Theory
|
| Comprehensive
Examinations Completed: |
- May, 2000 (Oral) Environmental Economics and Industrial Organization
September, 1996 (Written) Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Theory
|
| Dissertation Title: |
- Valuing Recreational Fishing Opportunities: Unobserved Characteristics and
Sequential Decisions in a Discrete Choice Model of Demand
|
| Committee: |
- Professor Steven Berry
Professor Christopher Timmins
Professor Martin Pesendorfer
|
| Expected Completion
Date: |
- Summer 2002
|
| Degrees: |
- M.Phil. (2000), M.A. (1997), Department of Economics, Yale University
B.A. (1995), Summa Cum Laude, Mathematics and Economics, State University of New
York at Geneseo
|
| Fellowships, Honors
and Awards: |
- Yale Dissertation Fellowship, 2001
Yale University Graduate Fellowship, 1995-1997, 1999-2000
|
| Teaching Experience: |
- Instructor, Yale University, Microeconomic Theory and Policy (Summer 2001)
Head Teaching Assistant, Yale University, Introductory Microeconomics (Fall
2000)
Teaching Assistant, Yale University, Intermediate Microeconomics (Spring
2001), Introductory Microeconomics (Spring 2000), and Microeconomics (Graduate) (Fall
1999)
|
| Research Experience: |
- Research Assistant to Martin Pesendorfer, Yale University, 2000-2001
Collected and analyzed data tracking projects financed by the Department of Defense. Wrote
flexible code to estimate a wide range of fixed effects regressions to identify patterns
in quantity, procurement costs, and research expenditures over time and across categories
of defense projects.
Senior Economist (1999), Economist (1997-1998), Triangle
Economic Research, Durham, North Carolina
Conducted analysis for litigation support and settlement negotiations in natural resource
damage cases involving PCB contamination, including the Fox River in Wisconsin, and oil
spills including the 1990 American Trader spill in California and the 1995 Skaubay
spill in Texas.
- For the Fox River case, assisted in drafting an assessment plan outlining proposed data
collection and estimation strategies, worked on survey design, managed and conducted
analysis of collected data, and prepared client presentations and draft reports.
Contributed to survey instrument design by developing a sampling plan, selecting the
language for the telephone screener, and conducting focus groups, verbal protocol
interviews, and pre-testing of both written and telephone surveys. Managed associates in
data preparation tasks, analysis, data validation, and report writing. Developed flexible
programs in both GAUSS and Stata for estimation of discrete choice models and evaluation
of potential restoration projects.
- For the American Trader spill, conducted analyses of existing data, drafted
critiques of opposing sides analysis, replicated their results, and prepared
technical summaries in support of an expert witness.
- For the Skaubay spill, collected on-site data and conducted interviews, critiqued
opposing sides analysis, produced preliminary estimates using transfer techniques,
and prepared client presentations.
|
| Working Papers: |
- "Valuing Recreational Fishing Opportunities: Accounting for Unobserved
Characteristics in a Discrete Choice Model of Demand," manuscript, Yale University,
2001.
|
| Conference
Presentations: |
- "Welfare Implications of Site Aggregation: A Comparison of Conditional Logit and
Random Parameters Logit Estimates," Annual W-133 Western Regional Project
Technical Meeting, Tucson Arizona, February 1999.
"An Analysis of Household Beach and Recreation Demand and Values," Camp
Resources VI, Wilmington, North Carolina, August 1998.
|
| References: |
- Professor Christopher Timmins
Department of Economics
Yale University
Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Tel: (203) 432-9901
Fax: (203) 432-6323
E-mail: christopher.timmins@yale.edu
Professor Martin Pesendorfer
Department of Economics
Yale University
Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Tel: (203) 432-3549
Fax: (203) 432-6323
E-mail: martin.pesendorfer@yale.edu
|
- Professor Steven Berry
Department of Economics
Yale University
Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Tel: (203) 432-3556
Fax: (203) 432-6323
E-mail: steven.berry@yale.edu
Doctor William H. Desvousges
Triangle Economic Research
2775 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
Tel: (919) 544-2244
Fax: (919) 544-3935
E-mail: whd@ter.com
|
|
| Dissertation
Abstract: |
- Recreation demand models provide valuable insights and information that supports both
management decisions and litigation in cases of damage to natural resources. While
discrete choice models have been applied extensively to recreation demand models, nearly
all researchers assume that they observe all relevant characteristics of the recreation
locations and that individuals faced with repeated opportunities to choose among locations
make each decision independently. My dissertation presents a model that relaxes both
of these assumptions. The models and techniques developed to estimate demand for
recreation, a non-marketed good, extend to other fields using discrete choice models to
estimate demand for ordinary marketed goods when not all product characteristics are
observed and consumers make repeated choices. The importance of relaxing these
assumptions is evaluated by comparing welfare estimates across model specifications for a
wide array of proposed policy changes.
Recreation demand models in general provide valuable insights and information that
supports both management decisions and litigation in cases of damage to natural resources.
The models and techniques developed in this dissertation to estimate demand for
recreation, a non-marketed good, extend to other fields using discrete choice models to
estimate demand for ordinary marketed goods when not all product characteristics are
observed and consumers make repeated choices.
Anglers constitute 30 percent of Wisconsin's adult populations and spend 15 million days
fishing the state's vast water resources each year. Using a unique data set that I
assisted in collecting, this research examines recreational fishing in Wisconsin.
The data includes a panel survey of 788 Wisconsin anglers during the summer of 1998, data
on the characteristics of fishing locations, and daily weather observations across the
stae. The survey carefully tracks anglers and provides detailed information about
each fishing trip including the date, exact location, and fishing success.
The large number of recreational locations, changes in characteristics from year to year,
and the costs of collecting detailed information make unobservable site characteristics an
undeniable reality in recreation demand modeling. However, researchers to date either
ignore this fact or deal with it in a very restrictive way by including an ad hoc set of
alternative or group specific constants. While the data used in this analysis contains
more detailed and extensive information than most existing recreation demand data, it
cannot claim to include all of the important characteristics that affect anglers
choices. Finding substantial effects of unobserved site characteristics in this detailed
data underscores the importance of controlling for them in recreation demand modeling in
general.
The first chapter of this thesis develops a discrete choice model that recognizes the
presence of unobserved site characteristics and individual taste heterogeneity. A
two-stage estimation approach based on Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (1995), which accounts
for unobserved site characteristics by including a full set of alternative specific
constants, is presented. Simulation techniques are used to recover the distribution of
individuals' tastes and a contraction mapping computes the alternative specific constants,
making the estimation tractable. The two-stage approach can recover parameter
estimates for those characteristics that vary only across sites, which are important for
policy experiments. To illustrate the importance of controlling for unobserved site
characteristics and explore the ramifications of ignoring them, this chapter presents
Monte Carlo simulations. Simulations show that a conditional logit model with the
common assumption that all site characteristics are observed produces biased standard
errors that dramatically overstate precision and can produce unreliable parameter
estimates, even if these characteristics are not correlated with included variables.
Further, ignoring unobserved site characteristics biases estimates of welfare gains
from proposed improvements, causing estimates at unattractive sites to be overstated and
estimates at attractive sites to be understated.
The second chapter explores the potential link between successive decisions made by an
individual over a relatively short time period measured in days, weeks, or months. The
actual catch of fish serves as the link. The model allows the fishing success on previous
trips to affect the probability of fishing and the probability of choosing a particular
site. Once we control for the angler's tastes, this allows for the possibility that
anglers may chose to visit a site that has a high potential catch of a species different
from what they caught on their last trip.
The estimated models allow examination of a wide range of policies. These include changes
in land-use and shoreland development, fishing regulations and management policies, and
fish stocking programs. The welfare implications of the policy experiments are compared
across models to determine their sensitivity to the controls for unobserved site
characteristics, heterogeneous tastes, and state dependence. Results show that model
specification substantially affects the magnitude of benefits from proposed improvements
and can even alter the ranking of projects. Given the potentially serious biases that can
result from ignoring unobserved site characteristics, the proposed model provides a
valuable new tool for recreation demand modeling and other applications of discrete choice
models of demand that allows researchers to account for unobserved characteristics, obtain
reliable parameter estimates, and perform relevant policy experiments.
|