NICOLA
FUCHS-SCHÜNDELN |
Home Address:
186 Lawrence Street
New Haven, CT 06511
Phone: (203) 752-1707 |
Office Address:
Department of Economics
Yale University
P.O. Box 208268
New Haven, CT 06520-8268
Fax: (203) 432-5779Citizenship: German |
|
| Fields of
Concentration |
Macroeconomics
International Finance |
| Desired Teaching: |
Macroeconomics
International Finance
International Trade |
| Comprehensive
Examinations Completed: |
May, 2001 (Oral)
Macroeconomics, International Economics (both with distinction)
May, 2000 (Written) Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Theory |
| Dissertation Title: |
Aggregate
Implications of Household Savings Behavior: Theoretical Analyses with Empirical Evidence
from the German Reunification "Experiment" |
| Committee: |
Professor
Giuseppe Moscarini
Professor Eduardo Engel
Professor George Hall |
| Expected Completion
Date: |
May 2004 |
| Degrees: |
M.Phil. (2001),
Department of Economics, Yale University
M.A. (2000), Department of Economics, Yale University
Diplom (1999), Latin American Studies, University of Cologne (Germany)
Diplom (1998), Economics, University of Cologne (Germany), with distinction |
| Fellowships, Honors
and Awards: |
Doctoral
Fellowship of the German National Merit Foundation, 2003-2004
Social Science Research Council Predissertation Fellowship, 2002-2003
Ryoichi Sasakawa Fellowship, 2002
John Perry Miller Award, Yale University, 2002 and 2003
Cowles Foundation Prize, Yale University, 2000 and 2001
European Recovery Program Scholarship of the German Ministry of Trade and Commerce,
1999-2001
Yale University Graduate Fellowship, 1999-2003
Fellowship of the German National Merit Foundation, 1996-1998
German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) scholar, 1995 |
| Teaching Experience: |
Recipient of the
Raymond Powell Teaching Prize for the 2001-2002 academic year, Yale University
Teaching Assistant, Graduate Macroeconomics, Yale University, 2001
Teaching Assistant, Macroeconomics/Growth Theory, University of Cologne, 1998 and 1999 |
| Research Experience: |
Assistant to
the Editors, Brookings Institution, Washington D.C., 2002 and 2003
Summarized general discussion for the Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2/2002
and 1/2003.
Summer Intern, International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C., 2001
Pursued empirical research on financial and macroeconomic consequences of stock
market liberalizations. Presented paper in IMF Institute seminar series, October 2001.
Summer Intern, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris,
2000
Performed an econometric analysis about the Euro equilibrium exchange rate.
Research Assistant, University of Cologne, Department of Economics, 1997-1999
Participated in various projects in monetary economics, international finance,
international trade, and European monetary integration.
Intern, ifo Institute of Economic Research, Munich, 1996
Conducted research about the "Tequila-effect" in Latin America, focusing
on Argentina and Brazil.
Intern, HWWA Institute of Economic Research, Hamburg, 1996
Assisted in a study about the influence of institutional investors on the stock
markets in emerging economies.
Research Assistant, Institute of Social Research and Politics, Cologne, 1995-1996
Contributed to study about children of addicted parents by preparing and
evaluating a survey.
Intern, Savings Bank of Tucumán, Argentina, 1995
Assisted in credit evaluations in the Department of Microcredit for Small and
Medium Enterprises. |
| Other Working
Experience: |
Summer
Associate, McKinsey & Company, Cologne, 1998
Developed a strategy for a trading company |
| Papers: |
"Precautionary
Savings and Self-Selection - Evidence from the German Reunification 'Experiment'"
(with Matthias Schündeln), mimeo, Yale University, 2003. [job market paper]
"Adjustment to a Large Shock: Do Households Smooth Low Frequency Consumption?",
mimeo, Yale University, 2003.
"Welfare Loss and Precautionary Savings Due to Uninsured Idiosyncratic Labor
Risk", mimeo, Yale University, 2003.
"Stock Market Liberalizations: Financial and Macroeconomic Implications" (with
Norbert Funke), forthcoming in Review of World Economics
(Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), 139(4), 2003; also available as IMF Working Paper,
01/193, December 2001.
"The Savings Behavior of East and West Germans - Theoretical Predictions and
Empirical Evidence" (with Matthias Schündeln), Journal of Applied Social
Science Studies (Schmöllers Jahrbuch), 123(1), 2003, 209-220.
"L'insoutenable légèreté de l'euro" (with Laurence Boone, Alain de Serres and
Vincent Koen), Economie Internationale, 88(4), 2002, 77-106; also available
as OECD Economics Department Working Paper, No. 298, June 2001,
"Tracking the Euro".
"Argentina and Brazil: Economic Reforms in the Presence of Volatile Capital
Flows" (in German, with Thomas Röhm), ifo Schnelldienst, 25-26, 1996,
33-43. |
| Conference
Presentations: |
NBER Summer
Institute, Boston, July 21-25, 2003.
Third Villa Mondragone Workshop in Economic Theory and Econometrics, Rome, Italy, July
2-4, 2003.
Fellows Conference of the Social Science Research Council Program in Applied
Economics, Santa Cruz, May
15-18, 2003.
Annual Meeting of the German Economic Association, Innsbruck, Austria, September 17-20,
2002.
5th International Conference of German Socio-Economic Panel Users, Berlin, Germany, July
3-4, 2002 |
| Workshop
Participations: |
Summer Institute
in Behavioral Economics, Berkeley, 2002.
Social Science Research Council Program in Applied Economics Workshop, Virginia, 2000. |
| Language Skills: |
German: native;
English and Spanish: fluent; French: intermediate; Portuguese: some reading and speaking
skills |
| References: |
Professor Giuseppe
Moscarini
Department of Economics
Yale University
P.O. Box 208268
New Haven, CT 06520-8268
Phone: (203) 432-3596
Fax: (203) 432-5779
E-mail: giuseppe.moscarini@yale.edu
Professor George Hall
Department of Economics
Yale University
P.O. Box 208268
New Haven, CT 06520-8268
Phone: (203) 432-3566
Fax: (203) 432-5779
E-mail: george.hall@yale.edu |
Professor Eduardo Engel
Department of Economics
Yale University
P.O. Box 208268
New Haven, CT 06520-8268
Phone: (203) 432-5595
Fax: (203) 432-5779
E-mail: eduardo.engel@yale.edu
Professor William Brainard
Department of Economics
Yale University
P.O. Box 208268
New Haven, CT 06520-8268
Phone: (203) 432-3585
Fax: (203) 432-5779
E-mail: william.brainard@yale.edu |
|
| Dissertation
Abstract: |
This dissertation
investigates the aggregate implications of household saving behavior in the absence of
complete insurance markets for labor income risk. The first two chapters exploit the
"natural experiment" of the German reunification, a largely unanticipated event
of unusual proportions for a developed country. The reunification offers a unique
opportunity to address well-known but so far insoluble problems encountered in empirical
studies of households motives for saving. The first chapter deals with the most
severe limitation of existing empirical studies of precautionary savings, namely the
possibility of a self-selection bias. As more risk-averse individuals save more when
facing uninsured labor income risk, but are also more likely to choose occupations with
low income risk, estimates of the importance of the precautionary saving motive are likely
to be biased. Institutional features of the German labor markets before and after the
reunification allow to quantify, for the first time, the size of the bias, and to obtain
more reliable estimates of the importance of precautionary savings. The second
dissertation chapter exploits again the German reunification to test the relative
importance of different potential life cycle savings motives. I derive certain stylized
facts regarding the saving behavior of East and West Germans after the German
reunification, and analyze which consumption theory is potentially able to explain the
observed patterns. The last chapter of the dissertation deals with the welfare effects of
idiosyncratic labor income shocks, taking into account variable labor supply as an
additional mechanism for self-insurance. I find that the welfare effects of idiosyncratic
shocks can be potentially larger than previously assessed.
The first chapter, Precautionary Savings and Self-Selection: Evidence from the German
Reunification 'Experiment' (joint with Matthias Schündeln), combines particular
features of the German civil service with the event of the German reunification to test
the theory of precautionary savings. Specifically, we aim to quantify the importance of
self-selection into occupations due to differences in risk aversion. In the presence of
this type of self-selection, failing to control for risk aversion in empirical tests of
the theory of precautionary savings will result in a bias that could lead to a false
rejection of the theory. Our approach deals with the two principal problems of empirical
studies of precautionary savings. First, we identify an occupational group, the civil
servants, facing an observable income risk that is significantly lower than that of the
rest of the population, due to institutional reasons. Second, in our main contribution to
the literature, we are able to demonstrate the importance of self-selection by using the
German reunification 'experiment'. We exploit the fact that for people from the former
German Democratic Republic (GDR) the German Reunification in 1990 caused an exogenous
reassignment of income risks to different occupational groups. This allows us to treat
their occupation as exogenous and uncorrelated with risk aversion. We find that the
households whose main income earner is a civil servant have significantly lower wealth
holdings than other households, even in the presence of self-selection. The implied size
of precautionary wealth is economically significant, namely 13% of total wealth. More
importantly, we show that in the subsample for which we can assume absence of
self-selection, precautionary wealth accounts for 21% of total wealth. This difference
suggests that risk aversion is a significant factor in occupational choice. Self-selection
of risk averse individuals into low-risk occupations is economically important and
decreases the total amount of precautionary wealth holdings. Neglecting to account for the
self-selection bias could lead to misleading policy recommendations.
In the second chapter, Adjustment to a Large Shock: Do Households Smooth Low Frequency
Consumption?, I test the relative empirical relevance of various consumption theories
using the German Reunification. It is largely agreed upon that consumption over the life
cycle follows rational rules. However, it is unclear which of several competing life cycle
saving and consumption motives is the most important one, since most studies rely on
explaining the observed comovement of income and consumption over the life cycle and might
suffer from omitted variable biases. The German reunification was a large enough shock to
influence low frequency consumption behavior. For East Germans, the reunification
signified a large shock to labor and retirement income, as well as to wealth levels.
Different theoretical models give unique predictions about the resulting saving behavior
of different birth cohorts. West Germans serve as a control group for analyzing the saving
behavior of East Germans. The identification of my estimates is driven by the exogenous
variations, due to the shock, of the net present value of income for people at different
stages of their life cycles. In my empirical work, I identify three stylized facts
concerning the saving behavior of East vs. West Germans: (i) East Germans save more than
West Germans after the reunification, (ii) the East-West gap in saving rates is increasing
in the age of the birth cohort, and (iii) the gap is declining over time. In my
theoretical work, I study which consumption theories can reproduce these three stylized
facts. The candidate theories are: saving for retirement, precautionary saving, habit
formation, consumption of durable goods, demographics, and rule of thumb behavior. I find
that the precautionary saving model is robustly able to generate the three stylized facts,
and conclude that the data gives strong evidence in favor of this model. I can clearly
reject rule of thumb behavior in my sample. Changes in the family composition over the
life cycle do not seem to play an important role in determining the saving rate behavior.
There is only very weak evidence in favor of a habit formation model.
The third chapter, Welfare Loss and Precautionary Savings Due to Uninsured
Idiosyncratic Labor Risk, analyzes theoretically the welfare effects of uninsured
idiosyncratic labor shocks in a general equilibrium heterogeneous agents model with
incomplete markets. In contrast to other studies, I endogenize the amount of hours worked
in the state of employment. The resulting size of precautionary savings is small compared
to the partial equilibrium literature, yet I find that the welfare losses from these labor
shocks, as measured by the equivalent variation in consumption, are large, namely 2.2% to
5.3% of total consumption. Endogenizing labor supply changes considerably the welfare
implications of idiosyncratic shocks. |