JOHN MIRIKITANI |
Home Address:
100 York St., Apt. 14L
New Haven, CT 06511-5622
Tel: (203) 562-1860
Fax: (203) 562-1860 |
Office Address:
Department of Economics
Yale University
P.O. Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Fax: (203) 432-1860
Citizenship: U.S.A. |
|
| Fields of
Concentration |
Public Economics
Industrial Organization
Labor
Education Economics
Law and Economics |
| Desired Teaching: |
Public Economics
Industrial Organization
Labor
Education Economics
Law and Economics |
| Comprehensive
Examinations Completed: |
Public Economics
and Industrial Organization (Oral), 2000
Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Theory (Written), 1999 |
| Dissertation Title: |
Charter
Schools and the Structure of the Education Marketplace: Student Test Scores and Subsidies
to Poor and Minority Communities |
| Committee: |
Professor Patrick
Bayer
Professor Christopher Timmins
Professor Steven Berry |
| Expected Completion
Date: |
May 2004 |
| Degrees: |
Ph.D., Yale
University, expected May 2004
M.Phil, Yale University, December 2001
M.A., Yale University, May 2000
M.A., Yale University, International and Development Economics, May 1998
B.A., University of California, Berkeley
Graduate Coursework in Mathematics and Economics, University of Hawaii |
| Fellowships, Honors
and Awards: |
Yale University
Dissertation Fellowship
Yale University Graduate Student Fellowship
Phi Beta Kappa
Kraft Scholarship Award
University/Departmental Honors
Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (A.P.P.A.M.) Minority Fellowship
Graduate School of Public Policy, U.C. Berkeley (declined fellowship from RAND
Institute/Harvard JFK School
of Government) |
| Teaching Experience: |
Teaching Fellow,
Intermediate Microeconomics (twice)
Teaching Fellow, Public Finance (undergraduate)
Teaching Fellow, Labor (undergraduate) |
| Research Experience: |
Research
Assistant to Professor Patrick Bayer: Research in local public finance and urban economics |
| Papers: |
"Charter
Schools and the Structure of the Education Marketplace: Effects on Student Test Scores
from Actual and Potential Entry" (2003), job market paper
"Charter Schools and the Structure of the Education Marketplace: Effects on Student
Test Scores from Subsidies to Poor and Minority Communities," in progress
"Modeling the Threat of Potential Entry: Applications to Antitrust and Real Estate
Valuation," in progress
"School Based Management: Does Parental Involvement Improve Public Education?"
(2001)
"Essays in Law and Economics," manuscript |
| Relevant Experience: |
Policy Analyst,
State of Hawaii Senate Business Development Committee
Education Non-Profit Volunteer
Education Politics |
| Conference
Participant/Other: |
Delivered Talk on
Native Hawaiian Issues, Yale Center for International and Area Studies |
| References: |
Professor Patrick
Bayer
Yale University
Department of Economics
P.O. Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Tel: (203) 432-6292
Fax: (203) 432-6323
Email: patrick.bayer@yale.edu
Professor Michael Keane
(Reference for Teaching)
Yale University
Department of Economics
P.O. Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Tel: (203) 432-3556
Fax: (203) 432-6323
Email: michael.keane@yale.edu |
Professor Christopher Timmins
Yale University
Department of Economics
P.O. Box 8264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Tel: (203) 432-9901
Fax: (203) 432-6323
Email: christopher.timmins@yale.edu
Professor Steven Berry
Yale University
Department of Economics
P.O. Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Tel: (203) 432-3556
Fax: (203) 432-6323
Email: steven.berry@yale.edu
Professor Joseph Altonji
Department of Economics
P.O. Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-0264
Tel: (203) 432-6285
Fax: (203) 432-6323
Email : joseph.altonji@yale.edu |
|
| Dissertation
Abstract: |
My dissertation
analyzes the structure, conduct, and performance of the education marketplace and is the
first rigorous empirical study of entry by Charter Schools. Charter Schools receive public
funding and autonomy from regulation in order to empower parents and educators to open new
schools and implement decentralized local school choice and education reforms, with the
idea of fostering competition that may improve the productivity of low-performing public
schools. The Center for Education Reform (2002) estimated that 2700 Charters Schools serve
565,000 students in 37 states, which ranks Charter Schools as perhaps the most sweeping
and rapidly expanding education reform in the US. I find statistically significant
confirmation of the predictions from IO theory that under deregulated competition Charter
Schools enter where there are "rents", i.e., low public school productivity, and
the threat of potential entry in a contestable market significantly improves
public school test scores in an entire metro area. The same model predicts the effects on
test scores from subsidies to minority groups targeted by traditional affirmative
action or the race-neutral alternative group of economically disadvantaged
students, due to the increased probability of entry by Charter Schools in response to the
subsidies. The study uses a unique dataset constructed using modern GIS software with
precise distances between all schools from a region with among the strongest public
policies in the U.S. to promote Charter Schools: Houston and Harris County, Texas. The
methods can be employed in any state in the US because the campus-level aggregate
data used in the study are commonly collected.
Supply/Entry is described by a logit model for location choices over census tracts using
public school data with demographic and economic data from Census 2000. The results
confirm statistically the prediction from standard IO theory that Charter School entry
occurs in tracts where there are "rents", defined as tracts where too much
taxpayer money is spent on public schools with consistently low student achievement. This
finding is fundamental to the claim that public schools may improve due to competition
from Charter Schools. An aggregate demand function is specified in order to predict
demand for Charter Schools, and estimated demand exhibits many statistically significant
coefficients consistent with the initial entry logit model: students are more likely to
attend a Charter Schools if their public school has low test scores, high student-teacher
ratios, and yet low productivity defined as high per pupil expenditures. Both supply/entry
and demand are confirmed to be highly local, indicating the importance of spatial
differentiation via location choice to understanding the market for Charter Schools.
Model for Education Policy Analysis. Predicted aggregate demand serves as a proxy
for revenues and Census 2000 variables proxy for costs in a reduced form value function
for entry which measures the profitability of choices in a logit model that yields a
probability of entry into every census tract in greater Houston. The probability of entry
is used as a measure of the threat of potential entry, which can then be related to
changes in any test scores for any type of student in any public school in
the region of Houston, in the process testing alternative IO theories of market structure,
such as globally "contestable markets" versus local strategic interactions as in
Fudenberg and Tirole (1984). Preliminary results show that even without government
regulation the threat of entry significantly improves standardized test scores of public
schools not only in the tract where actual entry is observed but also in hundreds of other
tracts in the metro area - a powerful and important result consistent with IO theory of contestable
markets. Furthermore, the model of aggregate demand permits calculation of demand by
different types of students in any location in the metro area, which can be combined with
any level of subsidy for those groups along with cost data, such as median rent
from Census 2000, into a structural profit function that models preferences for
serving various types of students, which then can be used in a logit model that predicts
the probability of entry into any census tract and the effects on test scores for poor or
minority communities. For example, subsidies based on affirmative action policies
directed towards minority groups can be compared with the race-neutral alternative
of subsidizing economically disadvantaged students, and test score changes can then be
predicted for any group of students in the metro area. |