Brian
Dineen |
Home
Address:
320 York Street
PO Box 203089
New Haven, CT 06520-3089
Telephone: (203) 435-5978
Citizenship: Ireland |
Office Address:
Department of Economics
28 Hillhouse Avenue
Box 208268
New Haven, CT 06520-8268
Fax: (203) 432-2128 |
|
| Fields of
Concentration: |
Industrial
Organization
Applied Econometrics
Economic History |
| Desired Teaching: |
Industrial
Organization
Microeconomics
Economic History |
| Comprehensive
Examinations Completed: |
Industrial
Organization and Economic History (Oral), 2002
Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Theory (Written), 2001 |
| Dissertation Title: |
Moral Hazard
and Adverse Selection: Evidence from European Auto Insurance Markets |
| Committee: |
Professor Steve
Berry
Professor Ben Polak
Professor Philip Haile
Dr. Michael Boozer |
| Expected Completion
Date: |
May 2005 |
| Degrees: |
M.Phil.,
Economics, Yale University, 2003
M.A., Economics, Yale University, 2002
B.A., History & Economics, University of Oxford, 1999 (Graduated first in degree
program) |
| Fellowships, Honors
and Awards: |
John F. Enders
Fellowship, 2003
Yale Graduate Summer Fellowships, 2001 and 2002
Yale University Fellowship, 2000-2005
Hicks and Webb Medley Prizes, 1999, Graduated joint-first place in Economics Class
Gibbs Prize, 1999, Graduated first place in the History and Economics joint degree
program
St. Annes College Academic Scholarships, 1997 and 1999 |
| Teaching Experience: |
Intermediate
Microeconomics, Fall 2004 and Spring 2003
Introduction to Finance, Summer 2004
Poverty under Post-Industrial Capitalism, Spring 2004
Econometrics and Data Analysis, Fall 2002 |
| Work Experience: |
Summer Associate,
Frontier Economics, London, 2003 |
Worked as part of a team
in UK Competition Commission margin squeeze appeal |
Research Assistant to
Rep. Richard Neal, US House of Representatives, 1999
Worked with key participant in Irish Peace Process |
Summer Intern,
Investment Banking, Salomon Smith Barney, London, 1998
Worked with head of media division on sales pitch for merger of two media firms |
|
| Other Activities: |
McDougal
Coordinating Fellow, Yale University, 2002-2003 (selected by competitive interview)
McDougal Social Fellow, Yale University, 2001-2002 (selected by competitive interview)
Yale Business Management Study Group, 2004
Elected JCR (Undergraduate) President, St. Annes College, University of Oxford,
1997-1998 |
| Papers: |
Isolating the Effect of
Financial Incentives on Driver Behavior: Evidence from the UK Auto Insurance Market (Job
Market Paper) |
Patterns of Asymmetric
Information in the Irish Auto Insurance Market (Dissertation Paper) |
The Impact of Asymmetric
Information on Competition Between Firms (Dissertation Paper) |
|
| References: |
Professor Steve
Berry (Chairman)
Department of Economics
Yale University
P.O. Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Fax: (203) 432-6323
Email: steven.berry@yale.edu
Professor Philip Haile
Department of Economics
Yale University
P.O. Box 208264
New Haven, CT 06520-8264
Fax: (203) 432-6323
Email: philip.haile@yale.edu |
Professor Ben
Polak
Department of Economics
Yale University
P.O. Box 208268
New Haven, CT 06520-8268
Fax: (203) 432-2128
Email: benjamin.polak@yale.edu
Dr. Michael Boozer (Director, IDE Studies)
Department of Economics
Yale University
P.O. Box 208269
New Haven, CT 06520-8269
Fax: (203) 432-3898
Email: michael.boozer@yale.edu |
|
| Dissertation
Abstract: |
Do financial
incentives, such as deductibles and no claims discounts, affect claim and accident rates
in automobile insurance markets? My contribution to addressing this question exploits a
unique feature of the UK auto insurance market to quantify the effect of financial
incentives on driver behavior. In the UK most eligible drivers pay a small fee to
"protect" their no claims discount. These policyholders can make a known number
of claims within a given period before they suffer a very large discrete jump in their
premium schedule. Under weak assumptions, namely convex utility cost of effort and concave
utility, I show that a driver should increase costly claim prevention effort as the number
of past claims increase. This result does not change when policyholders have the option of
not reporting claims. In the UK, claims expire from a policyholders record after a
predetermined number of years. When I incorporate this feature into the model, costly
claim prevention effort still increases in the number of past claims, except in some
extreme cases.
I test these predictions using proprietary data provided by one of the largest UK auto
insurers and control for selection effects in two ways. Following Abbring, Chiappori and
Pinquet (2003), I examine within-policyholder duration between claims. The large size of
the dataset (approximately thirty thousand drivers have at least two accidents) is ideally
suited to this test. However, this does not control for non-financial effects. For example
a driver may change his behavior in response to a traumatic accident independent of the
impact of financial incentives. I therefore propose a second method of controlling for
selection that relies on certain types of claims being uninformative about the probability
of other types of future claims. For example, a claim for damage incurred while the car
was parked or a theft claim is uninformative about the policyholders driving
ability. My initial results support Abbring, Chiappori and Pinquets finding that
financial incentives do not affect policyholder driving behavior, although my results
suggest that financial incentives do affect the decision to report claims. The results
suggest that drivers change their driving behavior after accidents but only in response to
non-financial considerations. These results have implications for regulatory authorities;
they should focus on non-financial instruments in their efforts to lower the number of
road accidents. Equally, my results have implications for insurers interested in
developing innovative auto insurance contracts.
Using a second proprietary dataset, I examine patterns of asymmetric information in the
Irish auto insurance market. This dataset contains all the policyholder characteristics
observed by the insurance company and detailed data on claims. I find at most weak
evidence that policyholders possess an information advantage over insurance companies. I
find no evidence in the Irish market of the learning patterns found by Alma Cohen (2002)
in the Israeli auto insurance market. The results suggest that information asymmetries may
not be a large barrier to competition, even in markets with little information sharing
between insurers. |